Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Is Education a Noun or Verb?
Thursday, November 24, 2011
T.O.Y. for this holiday
Sunday, April 17, 2011
What a day
Wow - What a day.
The day started out like any other day. I woke up and got my legs under me, scrounged around for some breakfast, and went to find my mother. She was already outside. The sky was lovely, with the sun just beginning to peek out. Only a light breeze blowing - a typical morning for this part of the world. Little did I know what would happen today.
I started to hear a commotion outside, so I went out to see what was going on. All of a sudden someone was leading me away from my home, my mother, everything I knew. All I had heard was a man say "The Lord has need of it." What in the world did that mean?
There was a crowd gathering, and I was almost afraid - I was only a couple of years old and had never seen anything like this from my little stable on a quiet street. Why was this crowd gathering? It certainly didn't have anything to do with me, did it?
Wait, why is this Man climbing on my back? That's never happened before, and I'm not sure exactly what to do. I don't even know who this Lord is, or what he's doing parading me up and down the street while He rides through the crowd. I guess I'll just make the best of it and walk as proudly as I can.
A King? People are shouting Hosanna to the King! They can only be referring to this Man riding on my back. And the people keep throwing branches - palm branches - on the ground as we go by. This Man on my back really must be someone special. And everyone seems to really love Him. They keep shouting and praising Him as the Chosen One.
And then, just as quickly as it started, He climbed down off my back and another man led me back home. Back to my stable, and back to the quiet street where I grew up.
What was that all about? I wonder if I'll ever see this Man again?
Wow - What a day.
Saturday, May 01, 2010
Together in Excellence (TIE) 2010
My first experience at the conference was an in-depth session on web 2.0 tools and educational support internet sites. Marcia Torgrude did an outstanding job of introducing tools that can be implemented in the classroom immediately.
One such tool introduced was Glogster, which allows students to develop interactive “posters” to share. These “posters” can include graphics, text, video, and links to internet sites. Using Glogster, students could create an interactive report on a theme, historic event, or scientific process. Using a tool like this requires more than just responding to questions and parroting back answers. It requires the student(s) to synthesize and create to show understanding of a subject.
Another resource shown and practiced was Prezi, which was quite unique in it’s approach. In some ways, I found it similar in theme to Glogster, in that you have one “page” to interact with. On that one page, you identify elements essential to your theme, then organize a presentation by creating a “path” from one element to the next. By arranging the elements, the relative sizes of each, and the order of the path, students must demonstrate a depth of understanding of subjects being studied. She concluded with recommendations for other sites to explore on our own.
Following the in-depth session was the first Keynote speech. Leslie Fisher, a self-professed gadgeter, gave an excellent walk through the world of current technology. Although her presentation was based on “things,” there was an underlying theme of how technology is changing in all areas of society, including the world of education. What I took from that presentation was the changing role of the educator in dealing with a generation of students exposed to technology before they are exposed to education. Gadgets and technology surround each one of us everyday. Students encounter technology before they see us each day. How can we expect them to “shut off” everything and then suddenly learn in an environment that doesn’t fit their way of thinking? That certainly gives one a “wake up” moment to think about; how should each of us respond to this challenge? How do we change ourselves to adapt to this new way of thinking rather than try to force them to change and risk jeopardizing the natural curiosity and ability these students possess?
Monday began with Dr. Jack Bacon taking the conferees on a trip through history and current happenings of the international space station (ISS.) Even though he’s a man of numerous degrees and languages, and could have easily buried everyone in details, he instead wove an amazing story from the very genesis of the ISS to the current day. Embedded throughout the presentation was this one theme; the only way something as massive and complex as the ISS could be created and sustained is through cooperation. He kept returning to the almost two dozen countries and dozen languages of the people who created, assembled, and are currently supporting the ISS, and how it would not be what it is today without that effort. I took from that presentation the need to infuse more group projects into the classroom – not just once in awhile to make it look good, but regularly enough to make it part of the everyday routine. That means I have to change the way I approach “teaching” the students. That’s a real challenge for me.
From there, I attended a series of breakout sessions on various subjects, each very instructive and time well spent. Three of the sessions were based on Apple, Inc. products in one for or another. Two of these, presented by Apple employees, extolled the virtues of the family of Apple products and their role in the education environment. They showed how the products from Apple easily support learning in the classroom.
Another session, about using the iPod in the K-12 classroom, was equally instructive on using technology tools to support curriculum. Presenters showed specifically applications they use for Advanced Placement students in a high school, but also extended that with ideas for other curricular areas and levels. I got a lot out of that session for consideration, including one program for assistive speech for individuals with difficulty or inability to speak. That program has already been recommended to our staff for consideration for one of our students.
The final breakout for Monday was on the importance of social networking in general, and Twitter in particular, and how it can help each of us become better educators. Leslie Fisher gave some history of the Twitter sensation, how it is a natural fit into the education world, and how some of the available add-on’s can help make it better and more usable for us – changing our routine to save time rather than add new demands on our day.
Angela Maiers kicked off the Tuesday session with an outstanding keynote on how to develop technical fluency, and how that makes us better for ourselves and for our students. Of particular importance is our need to filter what we get, then be able to routinely model for our students how to continually unlearn and relearn. She almost seamlessly followed that with a breakout session on building our Professional Learning Network (PLN.) Each of us owes it to our students to keep current, and the best way to do that is to use the smartest people you can find, and learn what they know. Great presentations.
The final breakout session I attended was Marcia Torgrude speaking on Thinkfinity. I haven’t done much with this site since its Marco Polo days. I was impressed with the changes and the community nature that it’s growing into with the new site. That’s something definitely worth following, exploring, and contributing to.
Capping the conference was Dr. Julie Mathieson with a great session on taking what we have gotten during the conference and using that to make an impact on our students. That was a fitting end to the three days.
It was a great conference, and time well spent. There is certainly enough to keep me thinking until TIE 2011.
Alan Buhler
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Professional Development - Easier to SAY it than to DO it
Sunday, October 04, 2009
Leaving your mark
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Google Forms & an iPod Touch
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Ya' know, back in St. Olaf...
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
God's will
The discussion went something like this: People frequently ask how a loving God can condemn people to eternal separation from Himself? The truth is - God doesn't do that - people choose it themselves.
It ends up there are two ways people can respond to God. The first is to say to Him - "Thy will be done." That's the road He wants us to choose. God would have it that everyone do that, but some will resist until it's too late. When that happens, God will reluctantly say, when their brief life here on earth has ended, "OK -I gave you all the chances I could. You blew it. Now, THY will be done."
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Some assembly required
For whatever reason, that phrase has haunted me today. It came into my mind shortly after I woke up, and many things I’ve heard, read, and done today fit well into this framework.
This is a common phrase when you receive something in pieces – they are all there, but you have to put them together to make something that does what’s intended. And an instruction sheet is a good thing, too, by the way. Without following the instructions, things may not work as designed.
I sing in the praise choir at our church. I am one voice of many. I have a part to learn and give back; that part is different from the person next to me, and theirs from the next person, and so on. We couldn’t each have just one piece that didn’t fit with the others. Some assembly was required before we could help lead the congregation in worship. The “instruction sheet” was the written music score; that was our guide to assembly.
Our sermon today related the grumbling of the Israelites as they wandered through the desert. God, by His Mighty Hand, had brought them out of Egypt, and buried their pursuers under a wall of water. God provided them manna and water as they needed it. Then he gave them quail every evening. They even had their own navigation system in the form of clouds and fire. They had all the pieces, but somehow still couldn’t put it all together. There was still some assembly required – about 40 years worth! They were a work in progress for all that time, and for a considerable time after they reached the Promised Land.
I was also blessed today to be able to help serve a meal for our local Cornerstone Mission. Many hands provided things for the meal – main course, sides, desserts, drinks – but it was all just pieces. Before we could be a blessing to these folks who desperately needed this food, we had to organize it, heat it, serve it up. Some assembly was required.
The room at the mission was filled with people; many of their stories would be tales of woe and tragedy. But we must not forget that these “pieces” are as valuable to God as each of us. Our situations are different, but our souls are the same. Though the puzzle may be more complex and difficult to put together there, some assembly is still required.
As I reflect on this in my daily life as a teacher of Middle School students, I have to constantly tell myself that they, too, are works in progress. They are putting together various pieces of their lives in order to be their own person – and it’s my job (my passion, if you will) to help them along in that journey.
Some assembly required.
Lord, Help me to assemble my life as a model for those I touch in some way today.
AMEN
Thursday, July 24, 2008
hailstorm
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
trip to Sioux Falls
(This is a later edit) I was doing some work with video and uploading to my internet web space at my school, and some of the recipients of the video were having problems getting it. So I made a webpage, and posted it, then linked it to this blog. Worked well.
More on the trip - We took our oldest Daughter and her kids with us, so all three grandkids were together. I think everyone had a good time of it.
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Educational dilemma
Here's the philosophical side: I've been reading a lot about motivating students by tapping into their love of gaming. I't a research-based technique that's recommended by many experts. This research says that's what students do in their free time, and that's what they love to do. So that's what we should do whenever we can make educational use of it in a classroom.
Move to the application in the classroom side: I teach 7th grade computers, where about half the curriculum is oriented toward keyboarding skills - striving for 35+ words per minute with 2 or less errors per minute on a 3 minute timing. This, in and of itself, is less than glamorous to a 7th grader. So I've tried to find games that support that part of the curriculum.
Enter http://play.typeracer.com - The site provides lines from various books and articles that people are asked to type - most of what I've seen are excerpts from books, songs, poetry - and appropriate for use in a classroom. There are two sections - a place to practice, and a place to race against others. After logging into the site, and working with it for just a couple of moments, all students were able to understand the game and how to play. Most of them were fully engaged for the alloted time. A couple of them were extremely competitive and became quite vocal as time progressed, and I could see that there was a spark that had caught on.
Here's where the question comes in. Students race against opponents randomly chosen from whomever is logged into the site at any given time.
We can specify and control in the classroom what our students may or may not use for a name when they sign into the game; not so with the rest of the random players from around the world who are on the site. Some of these names are not well chosen, and the students brought a couple of these to my attention. Nothing I saw was extremely offensive, but some still not entirely school appropriate. The practical thought here is that there's nothing this MySpace & MTV & Facebook genreation that I'm teaching hasn't seen. But I don't want to appear to condone the use of this type of language or vernacular in a classroom.
I like the site. The students like the site. It has educational value for typing skills. But should I restrict them from it because of what they just MIGHT see on it from other players around the world? If I continue to use the site, what's the best way to with those random occurrences when and if they arise?
Any thoughts are appreciated.
Sunday, April 01, 2007
What if I had owned the colt?
Luke 19:28-35 gives the story of a forgotten person in all this – the owner of the donkey colt. Although not called by name, nor described in any manner in the texts we have been given, this person’s faith and attitude are key to how this story unfolds.
It is likely that the owner was not a rich man. Donkeys are not what rich people owned. Rich people have horses and chariots and “fancy” stuff. Donkeys are workers, and likely this donkey was being raised for just that – to help the owner’s family conduct whatever business they were in. It was probably extremely valuable to that person and his family.
All of a sudden, strangers come into town, walk over to this colt, and start untying it from it’s post or stable or barn. I’d imagine the owner was just a little bit concerned about these people who, with no explanation, are taking the colt away. When confronted, their only explanation was “The Lord hath need of him.”
I’ve always believed that the stories in the Bible are accurate. That leads me to the conclusion that there was no further discussion, no debate, no more questions posed to these men. The colt was given willingly out of love. There was no promise of payment, nor of whether the owner would even get it back. It was just given away.
Which brings me back to the question – What if I had owned the colt? Would the story be any different? I’d like to think that I would be willing to do what the person in this story had done, but it really made me think about it. What would I be willing to give up if someone simply said to me “The Lord hath need of it?”
Sunday, January 14, 2007
Filling the barrels
The point of the sermon was that we need to focus on where the action really is, as well as WHO takes the action. So many times, we feel defeated when WE can't make something happen ~ in the church, in our family, our work, our lives. We have a responsibility to do what God asks us to do, but then leave it to God to make the difference.
The barrels were empty. All Jesus asked the servants to do was fill them up with water and take them to the steward. When they did what Jesus asked, the miracle was fulfilled. He didn't ask for anything difficult, or something beyond their ability. Just obedience. If they had not filled the barrels, or hadn't taken them to the steward, things likely wouldn't have turned out the same.
We are like the empty barrels. All we need to do is be filled and presented as "ready," and let God make something of us. Nothing fancy; nothing difficult. Just be available.
I guess I can do that...
Thursday, August 10, 2006
Not a typical post for me
I'm impressed by the intense emotion and creativity each of these evokes. Just thought I'd share.
Hope you enjoy them as much as I did.
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
A logical question...

It's rather hard for my 4 year old grandson (Jackson) to wrap his arms around the fact that I used to be in the military. Never having seen me in uniform, (I'm retired for more years than he's been alive) or never even seeing much to do with that type of thing, the "soldier" concept is rather vague. Furthermore, the concept of time is not yet fully developed. You will probably see what I mean.
Here's the way one conversation went. "Grandpa, were you a Soldier?"
"Yes." I replied.
"Did you carry a gun?"
Again, I replied "Yes, sometimes I did."
"Did you ever shoot any dinosaurs?"
What could I say?
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Epiphany
It goes like this - ask someone on a remote tour, or, what's common now, deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, when they are due to "rotate" back to real life. They are likely to tell you "...XX days (or months) and a Wake up!" Of course this means that they are counting the days until they leave. The "wake up" refers to the day they actually get to leave whatever duty they are enduring to return to their families. For many, their service is an interruption to their "real" vocation in life.
The epiphany is THIS! We are enduring a life that's full of temptations, trials, hurts, losses, etc, that seems to go on forever. What we see in the short term is not how God views it. Being here IS NOT our calling! We're here on earth to serve Him through various ministries, using whatever talents and resources He's loaned to us for our limited time here. Face it ~ even if we live to be 100, it's still puny when compared with ETERNITY! We are called to praise God, and He wants us to do it in his presence - FOREVER!
OK, we're here for XX years and a Wake up! We'll wake up in the presence of God. Does that change anything you might do or think or say? "O Grave, where is thy victory? O Death, where is thy Sting?"
How's that for making your day!
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
"Loose lips sink ships..."
Yes, That's frustration showing its ugly head. I've been listening to the news reports concerning the release of classified information associated with tracking financial records. And if I hear one more person, who is being interviewed as an "authority" on anything, say that "the public has the RIGHT to know..." I'll probably choke! I heard one person from the media saying something to the effect of (loosely quoted here.. ) "...it's up to the media to police and report on everything the government is doing..."
The title is chosen from a slogan used during our World Wars to emphasize that each of us has a responsibility to protect the information any enemy could use against us. We were united in this. Apparently, we aren't any more.
I'm speaking as one who has held high-level security clearances for most of my adult life. The public DOESN'T have the right to know everything! There are just some things that shouldn't be out there! Sometimes they just can't handle it. An incident comes immediately to mind from the first Persian Gulf war. On one operation, there were Navy Seals and other service special forces coming ashore for an operation, only to be met by the media with lights and cameras there to capture and report on how it was going! Absolutely ABSURD! Don't they understand the concept of special ops??? Or of keeping something quiet to allow it to work??? I guess not.
Just knowing something doesn't make it right to say it. Let the government handle things as they see best from the overall scheme of things. They have a lot more information than you or I do.
To comment on the "leakers" would be an entire different 'blog', so I'll not get deep into that. But it's clear that we have at least two elements at work in the country ~ the elected government who does things by established laws, and the people working for them who, on their own, seem to "know better" and take it upon themselves to put things into the public sector for their own purposes.
OK - I've said my piece - thanks for bearing with me.
The Colonel.....
Sunday, June 18, 2006
Opting out...
Let's see. I have to provide some essential information to get a credit card. If I don't give the information, I don't get their card. The company now has information like address, email, phone numbers, etc. on file. As I read this little flyer, it comes to mind that the company has now taken ownership of that information. They can publish, sell, give away, or do anything they seem to want to do, with it.
I can only gain back that control if I fill out a form that may or may not work, which may or may not reach the proper desk, or call them and work through some 10 levels of menu and then finally give up because there's no one to talk to anyway. I tell them I don't want them to include it on any lists that are sold, given away, or otherwise distributed. They are then obligated to not do that any more. (Oh yeah - if they happen to sell it before my message reaches them, 10/100/1000 other companies already have it, and I have to go through THEIR systems, too!) In fact, nowhere could I find that the company is under any obligation whatsoever to even tell you to whom your information was distributed! Now, I ask you, isn't that just crazy?
Why isn't the ACLU all over this? They seem to jump into all those areas where someone is taking away someone's rights! Of course, they're probably too busy fighting against important things, like including God in the pledge, or - heaven forbid - having the 10 commandments or a cross on federal property! This cause would at least give the ACLU something constructive, rather than destructive, to do! (sorry - didn't mean to start a rant...)
Why not instead have the choice to OPT IN instead of OPT OUT? You know, because it's MY information, and not theirs, they shouldn't be able to use it unless I say it's OK! Or, at the very least, require them to send the OWNER of personal information (e.g. ME) a detailed list of every place that information's been sent, along with a check for the use of that "trademark." There's a novel approach!
So - I've had my say. And, by the way, you have my permission to quote me!